What’s around the corner – a fast-food joint or a supermarket? A group of researchers decided to dive into how these neighborhood features might influence our health.
Exploring a 40-Year Health Journey
Once upon a time in Christchurch, New Zealand, a group of scientists began a fascinating journey, tracking the health of people born in 1977 and following their wellness journey until they turned 40 in 2017.
Dr. Matthew Hobbs and his team from the University of Canterbury found themselves particularly curious about how these individuals’ health might relate to their living environments, especially focusing on their access to different types of food outlets.
You see, they suspected that being surrounded by fast-food restaurants might not be the best thing for one’s waistline, given that these eateries often serve high-calorie meals that are easily accessible and affordable.
But how does this theory hold up under scrutiny? And could living near a supermarket, with its range of fresh produce and healthier options, possibly balance the scales, so to speak?
Fast Food vs. Supermarket: A Tale of Two Outlets
In their exploration, they discovered something intriguing. Individuals who resided nearer to supermarkets generally experienced smaller increases in body mass index (BMI) and waist size compared to those who lived further away.
Now, if you’re wondering what BMI is, it’s basically a tool that helps determine whether a person’s weight is healthy with respect to their height.
On the flip side, those who had fast-food restaurants as their neighbours saw a slightly more noticeable increase in their BMI and waist size over a decade.
Dr. Hobbs hinted at an interesting point here: the skyrocketing global rise in obesity since 1980 can’t merely be attributed to genetic or biological changes, given the rapid pace.
Could it be, he pondered, that the surge in readily available, budget-friendly, and calorie-dense foods played a pivotal role?
Zooming into the Food Environment Effect
Dr. Hobbs and his team coined a term “food environments” to describe the types and proximity of food outlets around where people live.
They were especially intrigued to understand the impact when a new food outlet opens up nearby or when people move to a new neighbourhood. It appeared that such shifts could indeed tip the scales, altering people’s waistlines.
However, there’s a little caution to throw in the wind here. The study only peeled back the curtain on how close people lived to various food outlets, without considering other elements like the cost or quality of food or how often people patronized these places.
Paving a Healthier Path Forward
The takeaway message from Dr. Hobbs and his team is thought-provoking. Could town planners and public health policymakers curate our environments to foster better health by being mindful of where fast-food restaurants and supermarkets are positioned?
In some UK localities, they’re already one step ahead, with policies in place to regulate the number of fast-food outlets through strategic town planning.
The results from this New Zealand study echo a global sentiment and question worth pondering: how can our living environments be crafted to naturally support healthier lifestyles and choices?
In closing, understanding how our immediate environments, particularly the availability and proximity of various food outlets, might influence our health journey is key in charting a way forward.
It inspires conversations about not just what we eat, but where we eat, and how accessible diverse food options are to communities across the socio-economic spectrum.
Follow us on Twitter for more articles about this topic.
Copyright © 2023 Scientific Diet. All rights reserved.